#SKETCHUP MOBILE VIEWER HOW TO#
#SKETCHUP MOBILE VIEWER FOR MAC#
#SKETCHUP MOBILE VIEWER ANDROID#
#SKETCHUP MOBILE VIEWER SOFTWARE#

One way to test this is by logging into the 3D Warehouse website. Please make sure you have your Google ID set up properly. It's the same method that's used for all of our products: the SketchUp desktop application, Extension Warehouse and 3D Warehouse. Here's some info I hope may help you or others who have login problems.ДЇirst, the Mobile viewer uses a Google ID for identity management. While some say that represents more preferential treatment, I say these are simple matters of economics.ДЄll of the details aside though, those who can read between the lines will understand there's no need to get upset about the mobile viewer only supporting one platform today.Д«owesy wrote:Have had problems trying to sign in on Mobile viewer

#SKETCHUP MOBILE VIEWER SOFTWARE#

And by the way, the SketchUp client software has never been on Linux, and someday we're going to drop support for MacOS 10.7 and Windows XP, too. We're also not going to put the new SketchUp mobile viewer on 'HP WebOS', the 'Apple Newton', or the 'Compaq Portable', either. We have no immediate plans to add support for Farsi, Klingon, Esperanto or Swahili languages in SketchUp. I know this will upset those who demand equal representation for all, but here's another dose of reality.

#SKETCHUP MOBILE VIEWER FOR MAC#

I personally see no reason to make one wait on the other.ДЄfter all, by that logic, if had waited until SketchUp for Mac was ready before releasing SketchUp for Windows, the product never would have existed, because it wouldn't have gained enough traction or exposure in the dominant platform to warrant porting it to the minority platform. Furthermore, I think most people would agree that if a company has a viable, stable, working product for one platform, they should release it as soon as possible, even if there are eventual plans to add support for a second platform. As such, it makes sense that we would focus on native iOS as the first target platform. The overwhelming majority of tablet users in all of our key markets use iPads. The fact that they didn't come to Denver doesn't mean they marginalized me-for whatever reason, that's just the way it worked out. Apparently several other cities were all prioritized above mine. But this is life, and it's nothing personal.Д¬ase in point, two summers ago, my favorite band did a small tour that didn't include a stop in Denver, so I didn't get to go see them. Yes, prioritizing one thing above another has the effect of marginalizing the thing of lower priority.

#SKETCHUP MOBILE VIEWER HOW TO#

But that doesn't stop us from using some basic logic to figure out how to prioritize the work we have to do along the way.

#SKETCHUP MOBILE VIEWER ANDROID#

So yeah, of course I want an Android version of this new SketchUp mobile viewer, as do most of my colleagues. For instance, those who know what Qt was like a dozen years ago will thank SketchUp's early designers for avoiding it.Д®ven though I'm typing this on a Mac, I've never used an iOS device of any kind in my life-not once. And just because one plans to support multiple platforms does not always mean doing to in a totally platform-agnostic way is the best approach, either. The fact that a company releases a new product with support for 'platform A' on the first day of launch does not automatically mean that there are no plans to ever support 'platform B'. It simply doesn't hold up to any scrutiny. Please understand that no offense is intended, but I think you're taking this argument far off the deep end. They need all their customers equally and would for heaven's sake never get the idea to like some customers more than others. In the country where we live, authorities and companies care about to avoid any bias towards their customer base. Aerilius wrote:Which still does not justify prefererism.

Sketchup mobile viewer